[Osx-nutters] AHMADINEJAD

[Google Kreme]

On 27 Sep 2006, at 09:28 , Jeffrey Hergan wrote:
> OK.  I think I can be more clear.  There is nothing that Muslims  
> could do to each other that left end liberals think would justify  
> US intervention.

"To each other" is the key phrase here.

You're right, liberals do not condone invading soverign countries  
because we don't like their internal politics.

But you know what, if the US invaded Britain after Labour (The dirty  
stinking commie party of the UK)  finally won their election, I think  
most liberals would be opposed to that.  Because they're right, it's  
not of our fucking business how anohter country works or doesn't work.

Now, if the US had been feeling guilt over giving Saddam all that  
lovely nerve gas to massacre the Kurds... well, that might be different.

> I don't think that's what the left says, though.  I hear arguments  
> like: "The US is the worst offender with regard to nuclear arms, so  
> we have no right to say anything to Iran or N Korea."  And "We  
> should treat nations like Iran and N Korea as soveriegn countries  
> worthy of respect, even if they plainly say that we are evil and  
> should be eradicated like the infidel scum we are."

Yeah, it's so much better to sink to their level (torture, mass  
killings, indiscriminate bombings, illegal incarcerations, and  
'secret' prisons) and prove them right.

Sorry, but the US in Iraq is no better than Saddam was.  Huge body  
counts, torture, and 'secret' prisons sounds like the same old same  
old.  Except fucktard has imported that brand of 'justice' to the US  
and is shipping US citizens into secret torture prisons to.

> Bush blew up the trade center, etc.

Bush ignored the warnings of an imminent attack and did nothing to  
stop it.  He went on VACATION after the warning was received.  He's  
as responsible for it as anyone.


-- 
"There will always be women in rubber flirting with me."