[Osx-nutters] AHMADINEJAD

[Patrick Coskren]

On Sep 28, 2006, at 5:00 AM, guy hammond wrote:

> Wow, and you throw your toys out of the pram when I just write  
> "KKKlinton".

Just out of curiosity, I understand "Slick Willie".  I understand  
"the Clenis".  But what's with "KKKlinton"?  His relationship with  
minorities was generally very good.

As for the cluster of 6s, just to stir the pot...  :-)

The idle thought has crossed my mind that, if the Antichrist were to  
come along, you'd kind of expect him to act the way Bush does.   
Highly and ostentatiously religious.  Fostering an interpretation of  
religion that is largely, as far as I can tell, antithetical to the  
actual teachings of Christ.  (I mean, you're not going to tell me  
that Falwell and Robertson are good people.)  Starting wars in the  
Middle East.  Vicious and nasty when caught in private moments.   
Using both direct power and subterfuge to slowly subvert the moral  
foundations of the nation he leads (and I'm talking about real issues  
like government officers torturing the helpless en route to rooting  
out the evil, not silly sideshows like whether hot sweaty mansex  
threatens the republic).

I don't think he's *actually* the antichrist.  But the irony's pretty  
strong, don't you think?

By comparison, Clinton just got his dick sucked.  But marital  
fidelity, though important, wasn't core to Christ's teachings the way  
peace and forgiveness were.  So, at worst, Clinton would be more of a  
garden-variety sleaze than an antichrist.

-Patrick