[Osx-nutters] AHMADINEJAD

[guy hammond]

Quoting Patrick Coskren <pcoskren at mac.com>:

> On Sep 28, 2006, at 5:00 AM, guy hammond wrote:
> 
> > Wow, and you throw your toys out of the pram when I just write  
> > "KKKlinton".
> 
> Just out of curiosity, I understand "Slick Willie".  I understand  
> "the Clenis".  But what's with "KKKlinton"?  His relationship with  
> minorities was generally very good.

Well, I don't mean very much by it, just that he was a good ol' boy southern 
redneck. I don't actually think he or Bush are any stupider than the other. 
As for relationship with minorities, that's interesting. KKKlinton preferred 
the company of self-parodies like Al Sharpton, it was Bush who actually 
appointed blacks to positions of high office. KKKlinton definitely had fixed 
ideas of how he expected blacks to behave, whereas Bush actually seems to be 
colour-blind.
 
> I don't think he's *actually* the antichrist.  But the irony's pretty  
> strong, don't you think?

Well, I wouldn't count myself as a Bush-supporter, particularly. I'm all for 
balanced debate. He's done some good things and some bad things. I think most 
people on the right would say the same. But the "anyone but Bush" side really 
mean it, they would happily see Osama bin Laden, Kim Il Jong or Hillary 
Clinton in the White House... 
 
> By comparison, Clinton just got his dick sucked.  But marital  
> fidelity, though important, wasn't core to Christ's teachings the way  
> peace and forgiveness were.  So, at worst, Clinton would be more of a  
> garden-variety sleaze than an antichrist.

True enough.

G


-- 
grh at dsl.pipex.com
http://www.grh-photo.com/

"First things first, but not necessarily in that order" -- The 
Doctor, "Doctor Who"