[Osx-nutters] Denial

[David Cake]

At 5:09 PM +0100 14/8/07, Stefano Mori wrote:
>If by "will" you mean you are making a forecast about the future, 
>then you need to empirically show why your forecast will work, and 
>why other factors won't affect the outcome, otherwise it ain't
>scientific.

	What is it that leads you to believe that climate science 
generally is not aware of these issues?
	It seems clear that the very thing you object to - that 
climate scientists work say we should DO something in the hopes it 
changes the outcome - makes it clear they are aware of the (very 
obvious) issue you seem to be getting worked up about here.
	Now that you lay it out straightforwardly like that, I'm 
really confused as why you think there are people in the debate who 
don't understand this. You might need to bring up an example.
	Cheers
		David