[Osx-nutters] Denial
Chris Gehlker
canyonrat at mac.com
Wed Aug 15 18:13:46 BST 2007
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Stefano Mori wrote:
> The point is, how can you demonstrate empirically that the method you
> have used to make your forecast is the best one to use? Some Q factor
> *may* stop the sun from rising tomorrow, but we have one point eight
> million empirical verifications of the forecast having worked
> already. That's a reason we trust that the forecast will work again
> tomorrow.
Just adding observations without building a model and formulating a
testable hypothesis adds nothing to our understanding. The sun will
*not* come up tomorrow in any solar system save this one and not
even on most planets in this one. It won't come up tomorrow at the
south pole. Because I have a model, I know many interesting things
about the sun. It takes many fewer than eight million observations
to verify my model.
--
The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a
proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and
oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us.
-Paul Valery, poet and philosopher (1871-1945)
More information about the OSX-Nutters
mailing list