[Osx-nutters] Re: religious intolerance

[Chuck Bennett]

On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Kevin Callahan wrote:

>
> On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:10 AM, Chris Gehlker wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:37 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, but that was before she was demonized as satan's love child  
>>> by the fundie faction of the GOP, and that asshole on the radio.
>>
>> I have to admit that I don't understand what it is about Hillary.  
>> She is the most hawkish and the most religious of the major  
>> democratic candidates[1]. One would think she would be most  
>> acceptable to the right. Yet somehow she's their bogey man.
>>
>
> maybe they're afraid she might do the right thing
>
> K
>


Her attempt of nationalize the health care system was the "thing" for  
me.

She may be hawkish looking at the moment, but I don't know how much  
of that is real and how much is just show for the middle america folks.

Don't tell any of my right wing friends but she she might be the best  
choice we are going to get[1].

Here on the right, I don't see anyone that excites me in the least.

Mitt looks the part and he has his slick (non) answers down pat  
already, but he hasn't really been tested on the national stage.
Guliani isn't going to get any 2nd amendment votes at all, and he's  
pro choice.   I think that combination drives away too many of the  
people he needs.
McCain?  Oh Please..  If we nominate him then we deserve Hilliary.

I know Roger is worried that the Left is eating it's young already,  
but the right is screwed up too.

IMHO, Piss on all of them, but that's just me..

=c=

[1] and then pray for gridlock..