[Osx-nutters] Jeb Bush on the Death Penalty in Florida - Google
Video
Chris Gehlker
canyonrat at mac.com
Tue Jan 9 20:24:32 CET 2007
On Jan 9, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Chuck Bennett wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Chris Gehlker wrote:
>
> A militia didn't hang him. He as found guilty in an Iraq court.
> Just plain old population numbers say that the odds of the hangmen
> being Shite are pretty high. I agree that it could have been
> handled a lot better but I don't really blame them for getting in a
> comment or two to a guy that killed nearly a million people..
>
Have you seen the video, Chuck? They are Madhi Army and they aren't
bothering to pretend otherwise.
>>
>> I suppose there are other issues that arise. One is for Christ's
>> sake why didn't the US either turn Saddam to an actual court for
>> trial
>
> It was an actual court. He even had Ramsey (I never met a despot
> I didn't like) Clark as a lawyer for awhile.
I couldn't find anyone outside the administration at the time who
thought Saddam was getting a fair trial. There were several posting
here dealing with the issue.
>
>> or simply detail a squad of soldiers to shoot him?
>
> Now that would have been a crime. What would be the difference
> between that and the soldiers that killed some civilians?
> We missed out chance when we didn't drop a grenade into the spider
> hole.
I'm upset about the incidents where soldiers killed some civilians
and I think you are as well. Neither of us would have cared if they
had simply shot Saddam. That's the difference.
>> If the former option were chosen, it's not like he would have
>> been acquitted: if the latter, it's not like there would have
>> been strong objections. What did they hope to gain from the
>> kangaroo court and the lynching?
>
>
> Who are you referring to as 'they'? By the time he went to
> trial, Iraq was governed by an elected government with a judicial
> system.
> We might find the system flawed and somewhat barbaric but it wasn't
> our (the US) call.
It's a puppet government. Real governments don't tolerate armies of
occupation on their soil.
[snip a lot of stuff that pre-supposes the government of Iraq is not
a puppet]
>> I suppose there is also a general issue about the hypocrisy of
>> claiming to be Christian while supporting capital punishment but
>> that's a piece of hypocrisy that characterizes the majority of
>> Americans.
>>
>> --
>
> I don't know. I was told that the correct translation was "thou
> shalt not do murder' which is a long way from 'not kill'
>
> aside..
>
> Several of the versions that say "kill" is the correct word are the
> King James,
> the Revised Standard, the New American Bible, the American Standard
> Bible,
> the Jerusalem Bible and the Lamsa Version. On the other hand, the
> New English Bible,
> the New American Standard Bible, the New International, the New
> World Translation,
> Today's English Version and the Masoretic Text opt for the word
> "murder"
>
> I can't read Aramaic so I have no idea what was really written.
None of this has anything to do with the teaching of Jesus who
advised his followers to love their enemies. But I never mistook you
for a Christian.
--
In America, anybody can be president. That's one of the risks you take.
-Adlai Stevenson, statesman (1900-1965)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tit-wank.com/pipermail/osx-nutters/attachments/20070109/d598f49f/attachment-0001.html
More information about the OSX-Nutters
mailing list